Last paragraph of sec 5.2: " Verifiers SHOULD ignore failed signatures as
though they were not present in the message."
Is that inconsistent with the idea of only reporting signatures that
verified or those that TEMPFAILed? In that model, failed ones aren't
reported which is logically equivalent to them being ignored. Seems
like a fit to me.
I read that as inconsistent with reporting tempfails.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet
for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html