-----Original Message-----
From: Hector Santos [mailto:hsantos(_at_)isdg(_dot_)net]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 4:49 PM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output summary - Mandatory Outputs
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Rather I am highlighting the limited DKIM output requirements is
outdated and insufficient to support today's (extended) DKIM mail
integration and security needs outlined by WG consensus-built RFC
documents:
DKIM Security Assessment (RFC4686)
DKIM Service Architecture (RFC5585)
DKIM Deployment Guideline (RFC5863)
DKIM Signing Practices (RFC5617)
DKIM Reporting using A-R (RFC5451)
Please show me any citation in RFC5451 that demonstrates your claim.
Sorry, correction, it would be the RFC5451 extension for DKIM
DKIM Reporting using A-R (RFC6008)
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6008.txt
Please show me any citation in RFC6008 that demonstrates your claim.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html