On Wednesday, May 04, 2011 01:01:57 PM Dave CROCKER wrote:
In terms of working group process, one line of criticism demands
re-opening (and, apparently, reversing) the work of the Update (RFC
5672). I haven't seen any working group consensus to do this nor any
industry feedback indicating this is necessary. Consequently, attempts to
pursue the content of that work is entirely out of scope for the current
working group effort.
If you're looking for consensus, count me in. I don't think it was progress.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html