On 5/4/2011 10:13 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Michael
Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 10:11 AM
To: dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output summary - proposing ODID "Originating Domain
Identity"
44 pages of diffs.
Updating an RFC number causes a diff. That's not a valid metric.
Since the diff is a side-by-side, it's worth noting that it's only 2/3 the
length of the full document.
But indeed it's an example of a statistic that is objectively accurate and
functionally misleading.
Just how onerous is it to look through that diff, enough to get a sense of the
changes? 1/2-hour? 1 Hour? Is that onerous, when seeking to put forward
fundamental criticisms of months of working group effort?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html