On 05/04/2011 11:26 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
It's because I didn't want to imply that those were the only two.
This is quite a remarkable premise for refusing to provide concrete
substance.
I'm trying to imagine how a working group could ever make progress,
were this premise prevalent. Don't offer substance without providing
a massive tome to cover everything that qualifies it enough to avoid
misunderstanding what hasn't been said...
More ad-hominems. I've written a DKIM stack. The first one in fact, followed
a week or so later testing with Murray. Call it an argument from
authority, but
I at least have some experience in what subtle and seemingly inconsequential
wording changes can do to implementations.
44 pages of diffs scares the living hell out of me.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html