On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 2:02 PM, John R. Levine <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com>
wrote:
1. State principals that are specific to the content of the draft and that
give guidance about the scope and boundaries of what should be covered.
2. Make specific suggestions for specific bits of text in the draft.
Despite the valiant work that Murray has put into the MLM document, my
preference, which I doubt has any hope of gaining consensus, would be to
throw it away and replace it by one page that says
a) many lists break signatures, which isn't going to stop
b) so it would be nice if they signed their mail on the way out.
Everything else is either too marginal to be worth worrying about, or not
a problem if a list's mail has a credible signature.*
Failing that, I don't see small changes making it any better, so just ship
it.
+1
--
Jeff Macdonald
Ayer, MA
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html