ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Weird i= in client mail

2013-06-17 23:22:50

On Jun 17, 2013, at 8:58 PM, John Levine <johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com> wrote:

At one stage i= was thought to represent different mail streams with 
different reputation,
however this did not get any traction...

As far as I can recall, I don't think anyone but you had that theory.
If you want two streams, you use two d= domains.

...the world according to John :P

The question was raised and dispelled on 
http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2007/10/dkim-i-equal-vs-d-equal/, proving the 
idea was in the air, and I read it in some deliverability documents in the 
early days (tho wrong too)...


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html