On 6/17/2013 9:20 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
On Jun 17, 2013, at 8:58 PM, John Levine <johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com> wrote:
At one stage i= was thought to represent different mail streams with
however this did not get any traction...
The question was raised and dispelled on
http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2007/10/dkim-i-equal-vs-d-equal/, proving the
idea was in the air, and I read it in some deliverability documents in the
early days (tho wrong too)...
As I said, there were a variety of intentions, descriptions, desires and
claims for i=. Different people had different views. None of the
alternatives was in the spec and therefore none were standardized.
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to