Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community

ietf-dkim

2013-07-02 01:05:17

On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 9:21 AM, John R. Levine <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com> 
wrote:

What I'm asking for is nothing like SES.  I want the signature to be

based on the envelope MAIL FROM:, but it is still the body that gets
signed.  No VERPing is called for. ...


Where can we read the draft?

+1.  I pledge open source support if a workable draft appears.

-MSK

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community, (continued) Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community, Michael Deutschmann Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP, Alessandro Vesely Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP, Michael Deutschmann Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP, Alessandro Vesely Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP, Michael Deutschmann Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP, Michael Deutschmann Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP, John R. Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community, Murray S. Kucherawy <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community, Michael Deutschmann
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] That weird i= is most probably EDSP, Alessandro Vesely
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with the DKIM design community, Hector Santos
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] STD 76, RFC 6376 on DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures, Dave Crocker
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]