ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] [dmarc-ietf] a slightly less kludge alternative to draft-kucherawy-dmarc-rcpts

2016-11-15 20:28:24
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:56 AM, John R Levine <johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com> 
wrote:

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-kucherawy-dkim-rcpts-01

I forgot to update the title of Section 3, but other than that I think I
captured what's been discussed.  Please let me know what I've missed.


How come rh= has one hash instead of several?  You can put all the
addresses in the To: and Cc: headers in one header without leaking, then do
separate single hash if there are bcc's.


I found Ned's comments about signing only individual recipients convincing,
so that's the direction I took in this revision.  It's hardly final; by all
means, let's hash it out.

So you want to pack all the envelope recipients into, say, a
colon-separated list in "rh=", and then just confirm each envelope
recipient is represented in that list?

-MSK
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>