On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:49:33 -0700, Robert Barclay wrote:
While in many cases these might be identical my interest is less in
transfer service introduction than in content authorization.
what you are saying sounds exactly like the goal of pgp and s/mime. in the
strongly hopeful belief that that you do not mean for us to pursue alternatives
to pgp or s/mime, i'll ask you to clarify.
i note you use the term 'transit service' rather than 'transit'. i have been
making a distinction between mechanisms that pertain to the transfer channel
(service), versus mechanisms that are applicable during the time of transit but
are not related to the channel, per se.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
www.brandenburg.com