In <16824(_dot_)40492(_dot_)723484(_dot_)512812(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com> Michael Thomas <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com> writes:
So it seems that a lot of people are taking it as axiomatic that a Sender: signature provides some utility.
Personally, I see very little utility in protecting the Sender: header, and far far less in protecting the Resent-* headers. I see a lot of utility in protecting the From: header, the envelope from (2821.MAILFROM), and the HELO domain. -wayne
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Internet architecture, roles and responsibilities, Dave Crocker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Sender signatures are useful for...?, Douglas Otis |
Previous by Thread: | Sender signatures are useful for...?, Michael Thomas |
Next by Thread: | Re: Sender signatures are useful for...?, Douglas Otis |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |