So it seems that a lot of people are taking it as axiomatic that a Sender: signature provides some utility. I can think of a lot of utility that a From: signature provides, but I frankly am not very sure what I'd do different if I saw a mail message with a valid Sender signature. Can those who think that Sender signatures are useful please tell me what they are useful for? Preferably things that pass the "mother" test (ie, things that an average user will derive benefit from). thanks, Mike
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: why the whole mailing list argument is silly, Michael Thomas |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Internet architecture, roles and responsibilities, Dave Crocker |
Previous by Thread: | RE: How mailing lists really work in 2004, Hallam-Baker, Phillip |
Next by Thread: | Re: Sender signatures are useful for...?, wayne |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |