"Sam" == Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf(_at_)mit(_dot_)edu> writes:
"Andrew" == Andrew Newton <andy(_at_)hxr(_dot_)us> writes:
Andrew> On Jan 3, 2005, at 5:03 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
>>> Maybe the working group needs to be chartered in phases. The
>>> first phase might be figuring out which proposal has clear and
>>> strong momentum. I have no idea what the milestones would be
>>> for such a thing. I'm just brainstorming.
Andrew> How about we give each proposal with more than 3
Andrew> interested persons its own bof/wg/universe with the
Andrew> instructions not to step on each others toes.
Sam> Thanks, I've been through IMPP. I think that you need to
Sam> have a strong showing explaining why you need more than one
Sam> solution.
To clarify: if you think you need more than one solution you need to
have a very convincing explanation of why. I did not want to imply I
thought we needed more than one solution.