Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
--On 2004-2-3 12:05 AM +0530 Madan Ganesh Velayudham
<mganesh(_at_)india(_dot_)hp(_dot_)com> wrote:
Section 9:
* Since there's no way (that I can see) to access another users
counter data (through the protocol), this text doesn't seem
relevant.
Yes, I agree. But to be expilicit.
It is "explicit" by reason of the specification simply not specifying
the facility. Having the security section talk about something that does
not exist in the protocol is just going to confuse people. The text in
question needs to be removed.
Yes, Lyndon. Thats a valid one. It is better not to confuse the people.
The updated draft will not have this text.
Thank You,
MG
--
_____________________________________________________________
___
/___\ Madan ganesh Velayudham
|/. .\| STSD, India
( ) ) +91 80 (2) 205 3108
\ = /
_)_(_ There are no limitation in what you can do
except the limitations of your own mind.
_____________________________________________________________