ietf-mta-filters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Draft of sieve WG charter

2004-09-22 10:09:49

Hi ned,

--On Tuesday, September 21, 2004 4:37 PM -0700 
ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:

> Sorry for the delay in getting this out. Hopefully better late than never.
>
> Comments, of course, are strongly encouraged.

Thanks for putting this together. Apart from the issues Kjetil pointed out,
the only thing I would suggest is pushing back the 3028bis milestones by
one month to give us a bit more time to trawl through the archives for
bugs/issues and convert the original source to XML or whatever.

Done.

Also, the
ADs have said they would much rather have conservative milestones that are
met, rather than aggressive ones that aren't met - however I think the
milestones on the new extensions look OK.

Good. The list is long, but it belies the fact that most of this stuff
has been around for a while and has already seen extensive discussion.

One more thing - there are no milestones for the updates to existing
extensions covered by action item (2). I suggest we add those and have them
trail the 3028bis milestones by a month.

Oops. Added.

                                Ned


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>