ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com writes:
I believe there was a time when we didn't want to refer to variables
in the vacation draft bevcause it was assumed variables would take
much longer to complete. That's no longer true - variables is in last
call while we're still fine tuning vacation. So how about simply
referring to the variables document and say that any hash SHOULD
cover the unexpanded :subject and reason arguments?
Sound good, but since everyone else is being pedantic I get to go too.
Does the unexpanded subject strip Re:, or will I get another vacation
message if I reply to the first vacation message?
Arnt