Re: NULL vs. ""

Kjetil Torgrim Homme writes:
> I wouldn't mind adding alternative b) to the spec, though, it may be 
> useful in some cases.
I'd say no. Noone has asked for it yet.

Nigel needed something to do with emptiness or nullness, but I didn't 
really understand what. Doesn't seem as though he wanted b), though.
Arnt