[Top] [All Lists]

Re: NULL vs. ""

2005-05-27 13:35:22

Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> And since "" is a empty string, not an NULL string. The comparator text
> states that NULL strings aren't substrings of anything, so :contains
> ["X-Caffeine"] [:null] should evaluate to false (if :null were valid).

I deeply regret using the words "null string" and apologize for my

"null" should be changed to "empty" everywhere in 3028bis, and we can
avoid this confusion.

I'm not sure what a NULL string means in the context of Sieve, 822, or
at all, actually.

It's nice to know I'm not the only one who is confused by all this.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>