Re: 3028bis open issue #2: unknown envelope-part names

Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> I still think that an implementation should treat an unrecognized 
> envelope part as an error. Scripts should not be using a feature without 
> a proper require statement.
I don't feel strongly about my vote, and I'm not a guru of SMTP
protocols either, so as long as the 'auth' is added in the
clarification, that's fine with me too. 8-)

Alexandros