Re: Security review of SIEVE vacation

Ned Freed wrote:

> > Section 3.7 says "The vacation is incompatible with reject.".  I think
> > there are some words missing there.
> I'll change this to read "the vacaction action is incompatible with 
> the sieve
> reject action".
Which reminds me: reject is now defined in a separate document and there 
is no reference to it.