Re: Security review of SIEVE vacation

> Ned Freed wrote:
> >> Section 3.7 says "The vacation is incompatible with reject.".  I think
> >> there are some words missing there.
> >
> > I'll change this to read "the vacaction action is incompatible with
> > the sieve
> > reject action".
> Which reminds me: reject is now defined in a separate document and there
> is no reference to it.
FYI, this is fixed in the -03 version.

                                Ned