[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Security review of SIEVE vacation

2005-09-18 09:04:34

Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:

That said, the WG may choose not to solve that use case.
I am afraid that's the only sensible way, but the vacation extension
should probably document this in section 6, security considerations.

  If mail is forwarded from a site that uses subaddressing, it may
  be impossible to list all recipient addresses with ":addresses".

Seems reasonable. I'll add it unless someone objects.

This seems fine.  Is "subaddressing" a well-defined term?

Yes, see draft-ietf-sieve-rfc3598bis-01.txt