In section 2, since when did RFC 2119 define "CAN"?
Do the references to SMTP MAIL FROM require at least an informative
reference to RFC 2821?
Section 4.3 requires support for RFC 2047 encoding of the subject;
should that same requirement be placed on any phrase portion of the
from?
An example using the :mime parameter would be nice. How about:
require "vacation";
vacation :mime text:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=foo
--foo
I'm at the beach relaxing. Mmmm, surf...
--foo
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd";>
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>How to relax</TITLE>
<BASE HREF="http://home.example.com/pictures/";></HEAD>
<BODY><P>I'm at the <A HREF="beach.gif">beach</A> relaxing.
Mmmm, <A HREF="ocean.gif">surf</A>...
</BODY></HTML>
--foo--
.
In section 5, there's a space missing between the RFC3461 reference and
the next word, "is".
Philip Guenther