Re: Minor issue in draft-ietf-sieve-spamtestbis-02.txt

Cyrus Daboo wrote:

> Interesting - I can't ever recall that being discussed before, at 
> least in my presence :-). But it does provide an interesting solution 
> to the 'untested' case which is somewhat awkward with the :percent 
> option.
> So here is a proposal: remove the current "untested" return value and 
> instead require scripts to use :count to determine that case with the 
> behavior of :count being defined as Ned suggested.
This looks fine to me.

Just to clarify: "spamtest :value" would return 0 for both "untested" 
and "definitely non spam" case?