1). “SHOULD be incompatible with other actions” is too strong, for
example there are good reasons to do reject+fileinto.
I tend to agree that reject should be made compatible with other actions
(except for vacation), so I would like to at least downgrade SHOULD to MAY.
2). Non ASCII text in rejection string - should it cause creation of
DSN/MDN, runtime error or stripping of non-ASCII content?
Should we add a tagged argument to control this?
Or maybe we need another capability to enable UTF-8 clean rejection?
I am leaning toward having an extra capability to enable UTF-8 rejection
text over SMTP/LMTP protocol.
3). Arnt has requested to allow for reject+redirect to be treated as
just reject. I am not sure I like that. Opinions?
Comments?
Alexey