Re: Review of draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-02

Randall Gellens wrote:

> > >  (6) What is the rational for item 1 on the action list in Section 
> > > 3.1 (as opposed to rejecting even if the MAIL FROM is null)?
> > You have a point. If protocol level rejection is available, the 
> > recipient might just reject the message. For DSNs/MDNs, the server 
> > just "MUST NOT generate" them, right?
> I meant, why require that messages with a null MAIL FROM be accepted 
> and discarded?  Why not just fail the transaction?
I think I understood you and we are talking about the same thing. I will 
do the change.