On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 23:36 -0600, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Ned Freed wrote:
Sorry, missed that was one of the core rules. But that makes me wonder
if LWSP wouldn't be more appropriate...
That's an interesting idea, as it would let you 'wrap' a string in the
script without including the CRLF in the string's value. Hmm.
that could be useful, I guess, although I personally would have
preferred adopting the common convention of ending lines with backslash
if we need this capability. sneaking it in through encoded-character is
probably easier, though.
--
Kjetil T.