Re: Naming conventions for Sieve RFCs

> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sieve-variables
> > Sieve Extension: Variables
> Your proposal should work here.
>
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sieve-notify-08
> > Sieve Extension: Notifications
> I can change the title, but I think that:
>  SIEVE Email Filtering Extension: Notifications
>
> is slightly more informative than:
>
>  SIEVE Email Filtering: Enotify Extension
>
> (who would know that enotify is about notifications?)
>
> Opinions?
I'd be happy with:

Sieve Email Filtering: Notifications

> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sieve-3431bis-04
> > Sieve Extension: Relational Tests
> The same problem as above here: I think "Relational Tests" is more
> informative that "Relational Extension"
I'd be happy with:

Sieve Email Filtering: Relational Tests

I don't care if it's SIEVE or Sieve, either, but think it better to be
consistent, and it isn't consistent out there at the moment.

Nigel