Cyrus Daboo writes:
I need to make a determination of WG consensus on this specification,
and specifically need to know:
1) How many people have reviewed this draft?
I at least.
2) Are there any problems with it?
Not really. I think it's the best that can be done in the circumstances,
and enough of an advance to be worth doing.
3) Do people agree with Matthew's proposed text?
Is that -06? I think -06 is fine. One nit.
I need to get sufficient responses from WG participants so we can move
forward with this draft.
Also: I'll rename my "refuse" in my code and verify that the code does
everything in -06. (Draft -06 is closer to my code than the earlier
version I implemented. I like that.)
Arnt