Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-05.txt

Cyrus Daboo writes:
> That is my recollection too. I will have to check up on the exact 
> procedure for this - certainly the write-up I do will make mention of 
> it, what I don't know is whether there has to be something in the 
> draft itself.
The same thing (AFAICR) happened for RFC 4978, which refers normatively 
to RFC 1951. The dependency had to be called out in the IETF Last Call, 
that was the only thing I noticed.
Arnt