Re: Updated Sieve environment draft posted

Ned Freed writes:
> > as it doesn't require variables, but also having the information 
> > available via a variable namespace seems clean to me too since it 
> > builds on language elements and concepts already out there. But I 
> > can see some of the drawbacks too: one being that it would make 
> > implementation of this extension slightly harder/slower/less likely 
> > for any product that also implements "variables" if this extension 
> > mandated adding a variables namespace. But only slightly.
> That's my main concern here - I want to keep this simple. I think the 
> main use-case for environment is as a test.
Yes. I like the simplicity and brevity of the document, and I like that 
it doesn't depend on variables.
Arnt