Re: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?

Alexey Melnikov writes:
> If we want to allow for magic comments, it make sense for them to be 
> in a separate namespace. But then magic comments are typically 
> implementation specific. So I unless we want to startadize them, I 
> don't think the document needs another namespace.
Each generator may want to use a namespace of its own for its particular 
foo. I am not an expert in this. If that's considered good XML taste, 
then that should be illustrated in an example or two.
Arnt