On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Ned Freed
<ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com> wrote:
Alexey Melnikov writes:
If we want to allow for magic comments, it make sense for them to be
in a separate namespace. But then magic comments are typically
implementation specific. So I unless we want to startadize them, I
don't think the document needs another namespace.
Each generator may want to use a namespace of its own for its particular
foo. I am not an expert in this. If that's considered good XML taste,
then that should be illustrated in an example or two.
I certainly want to allow that - indeed, I don't know of a way to disallow
it.
But I don't want to require this approach.
AFACT the current draft does not allow mixing of namespaces
- robert