Hi,
--On December 13, 2011 11:54:24 AM +0000 Alexey Melnikov
<alexey(_dot_)melnikov(_at_)isode(_dot_)com> wrote:
My question is: do you think it is useful to have a Sieve SPECIAL-USE
counterpart? And in what form?
This looks interesting to me. Your proposal above looks fine to me.
Individual Hat: +1. There might be one awkward part to this: RFC 6154
introduces the concept of a "virtual mailbox", e.g., special use \Trash
could be an aggregate of all messages in all mailboxes that have the
\Deleted flag set. In that case a fileinto a virtual mailbox is not
meaningful per se, but instead we would have to allow the sieve/imap system
some latitude to do the right thing (i.e., for this example, apply the
deleted flag and put the message somewhere appropriate - perhaps defaulting
to inbox).
Chair Hat: Since SIEVE WG is not taking on any new work at this point,
please make this an individual submission.
--
Cyrus Daboo
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
sieve(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve