Hi Ned,
On 1/16/2013 4:10 AM, Ned Freed wrote:
What do you think? Would you be interested in having functionality like
this standardized? Should I submit this as a draft?
I think the underlying idea is excellent and deserves to be
standardized in one
form or another. I also like the way the optional parameters make the
test easy
to use in the default way, but provide the flexibility to test
arbitrary string
parameters.
About the only thing that's missing is the ability to do things like
count
occurances, and I'm pretty strongly inclined not to add that.
So yes, please submit this and let's work on getting it standardized.
Ok, I turned it into an Internet draft.
Here is the submission:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate/
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate-00
Regards,
Stephan.
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
sieve(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve