On 4/29/04 at 6:06 PM -0400, Andrew Newton wrote:
[...]it is best that this working group first concentrate on
creating a DNS RR addressing the 2821 identities and then proceed to
consideration of 2822 identities.
[...]the working group must develop a single policy framework (a
single language for describing sender policy language and a single
DNS RR to contain policies written in that language) to be used by
both the 2821- and 2822-based mechanisms. Accordingly, as the
working group completes its work on the 2821-based mechanism, the
policy framework developed must be adequate to reasonably support
the needs of a 2822-based mechanism.
Just checking to make sure I understand the next steps then. Is the
following what you propose?
1. Come up with a RR (TXT or a new one)
2. Come up with a policy language that will be used in the contents
of that RR that can support 2821 *and* 2822 policies.
3. Come up with some specific 2821 policy (or policies) defined in
that language.
4. Come up with some specific 2822 policy (or policies) defined in
that language.
Sound right?
pr
--
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
QUALCOMM Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102