Just checking to make sure I understand the next steps then. Is the
following what you propose?
1. Come up with a RR (TXT or a new one)
2. Come up with a policy language that will be used in the contents of
that RR that can support 2821 *and* 2822 policies.
3. Come up with some specific 2821 policy (or policies) defined in
that language.
4. Come up with some specific 2822 policy (or policies) defined in
that language.
Sound right?
i would switch (1) and (2), otherwise we are in agreement, e.g.,
- come up with a policy language
- come up with an RR to contain it
- come up with a 2821-based policy
- come up with a 2822-based policy
/mtr