Re: Identity consensus and working group direction

--Marshall Rose 
<mrose+internet(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)mxcomp(_at_)dbc(_dot_)mtview(_dot_)ca(_dot_)us>
 wrote:
> > Just checking to make sure I understand the next steps then. Is the
> > following what you propose?
> i would switch (1) and (2), otherwise we are in agreement, e.g.,
>
>         - come up with a policy language
>         - come up with an RR to contain it
>         - come up with a 2821-based policy
>         - come up with a 2822-based policy
>
> /mtr

Excellent.  Sounds right on to me!

gregc

--
Greg Connor <gconnor(_at_)nekodojo(_dot_)org>