Re: Identity consensus and working group direction2004-04-29 20:09:01--Marshall Rose <mrose+internet(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)mxcomp(_at_)dbc(_dot_)mtview(_dot_)ca(_dot_)us> wrote: Just checking to make sure I understand the next steps then. Is the following what you propose?i would switch (1) and (2), otherwise we are in agreement, e.g., - come up with a policy language - come up with an RR to contain it - come up with a 2821-based policy - come up with a 2822-based policy /mtr Excellent. Sounds right on to me! gregc -- Greg Connor <gconnor(_at_)nekodojo(_dot_)org>
|
|