Re: Alternative to TXT or new RR was: Comments on draft-ietf-marid-core-

On Jun 11, 2004, at 5:24 PM, Michel Py wrote:
> As it appears their implementation is not compliant with RFC1464 (I did
> not see any attributes nor equal sign), I would say it's ISC's problem.
RFC 1464 clearly says "Experimental".
TXT is defined RFC 1035 (or so says RFC 1464).

-andy