ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Could binary encoding really be the answer?

2004-06-23 22:02:18

On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 19:16, william(at)elan.net wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Douglas Otis wrote:

3) A type of PTR record to build external reference lists with a
matching protocol field to the inverse SRV record also for selection.

Maybe we should consider just reusing existing PTR record since it has
no defined meaning and use for domains (only meaning is for IN-ADDR tree)?

And if we need something more advanced, I already wrote how NAPTR records
may possibly be used for similar purposes and they are kind of like more 
enhanced and universal PTR.

I was adding this to employ an additional select mechanism to allow a
common record type to be used by more than one protocol while avoiding
the problem of special labels as related to wild cards.  If such a
select field could be added to the inverse SRV record, then having the
same mechanism would be helpful for a PTR type of record.  It may even
be helpful to add a new SRV record with this feature for the same
reasons.  Okay, this makes 5 new record types.

-Doug