Ok, I said DMP isn't being pushed by anyone, but I'll list it anyway
1) solid I-D: Yes
2) working code: Yes
3) testing: Yes
4) IP Licensing: No problems
5) gratuitous incompatibilities: None.
I think that DMP is in far better shape than most of the other
proposals that appear to be much more likely to advanced by this
working group. *boggle*
In some anti-spam mailing lists this would warrant a "C&C" warning. :-)
But thanks for bringing this up. I was thinking about adding support for
marid-submitter and portions of marid-core (notably the RFC2822 Resent-From:
header) as I've asked about earlier. The end result will be fewer lookups
per message - a minimum of one and maximum of two, compared to a maximum of
*four* - thanks to the information provided through the above drafts.
How about I throw that on the table and see who pokes at it?
--
PGP key (0x0AFA039E):
<http://www.pan-am.ca/consulting(_at_)pan-am(_dot_)ca(_dot_)asc>
Sometimes it's hard to tell where the game ends and where reality bites,
er, begins. <http://vmyths.com/resource.cfm?id=50&page=1>