IETF MARID (date)
July 31, 2004
- Re: Is the back door open?, Frank Ellermann, 19:43
- Re: Is the back door open?, Andrew Newton, 18:22
- Re: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Douglas Otis, 11:42
- Re: How is SPF different from RMX?, Alan DeKok, 11:38
- Re: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Richard Parker, 10:49
- Re: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, william(at)elan.net, 10:12
- RE: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:59
- Re: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, wayne, 09:43
- Re: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Chris Haynes, 09:30
- RE: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, John Glube, 09:13
- Different Sender-ID definition, Douglas Otis, 08:59
- Re: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Meng Weng Wong, 08:51
- RE: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Larry Seltzer, 08:34
- Re: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Meng Weng Wong, 08:04
- RE: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:01
- Re: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Chris Haynes, 02:47
- Re: Is the back door open?, Michel Bouissou, 02:18
- Re: Is the back door open?, Douglas Otis, 02:07
- Re: How is SPF different from RMX?, Michel Bouissou, 01:47
July 30, 2004
- RE: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, John Glube, 22:41
- RE: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Gordon Fecyk, 19:55
- RE: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, william(at)elan.net, 18:50
- Re: How is SPF different from RMX?, Dean Anderson, 18:46
- RE: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Larry Seltzer, 18:27
- RE: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Bill McInnis, 17:58
- Re: How is SPF different from RMX?, Michel Bouissou, 17:27
- Re: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Harold A'Hole, 17:12
- RE: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Daryl Odnert, 17:10
- RE: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Bill McInnis, 16:50
- Re: How is SPF different from RMX?, Dean Anderson, 16:48
- RE: How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Daryl Odnert, 16:44
- Re: How is SPF different from RMX?, Dean Anderson, 16:18
- How would SPF or Sender Id caught this one?, Bill McInnis, 15:35
- Re: Is the back door open?, Mark Lentczner, 14:44
- Re: Is the back door open?, Ryan Ordway, 12:27
- Re: The forged bounce question, Douglas Otis, 11:27
- Re: Is the back door open?, Douglas Otis, 08:46
- Re: The forged bounce question, Michel Bouissou, 07:30
- Re: The forged bounce question, Sam Silberman, 07:19
- Re: Is the back door open?, Andrew Newton, 07:02
- Re: The forged bounce question, Douglas Otis, 06:24
- Re: The forged bounce question, Tony Finch, 05:09
- Re: Is the back door open?, Bill McQuillan, 00:41
- Re: The forged bounce question, Michel Bouissou, 00:39
July 29, 2004
- Re: Is the back door open?, Douglas Otis, 23:35
- Re: Is the back door open?, Douglas Otis, 21:13
- Re: Is the back door open?, Andrew Newton, 18:25
- Re: Is the back door open?, Rand Wacker, 17:45
- Re: Is the back door open?, Douglas Otis, 17:09
- Re: alternate submitter syntax, Frank Ellermann, 13:55
- Re: Is the back door open?, Douglas Otis, 12:52
- RE: Request to move PRA to its own draft, John Glube, 12:16
- Re: How is SPF different from RMX?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 11:07
- Re: Is the back door open?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:47
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Nathaniel Borenstein, 10:40
- Request to move PRA to its own draft, Carl S. Gutekunst, 10:24
- Re: How is SPF different from RMX?, Jim Fenton, 09:47
- Re: Is the back door open?, Andrew Newton, 08:53
- Re: Is the back door open?, Rand Wacker, 07:35
- Re: Is the back door open?, Alan DeKok, 07:25
- Re: Is the back door open?, Douglas Otis, 00:19
July 28, 2004
- RE: alternate submitter syntax, Terje Petersen, 23:22
- Re: alternate submitter syntax, Meng Weng Wong, 22:22
- RE: alternate submitter syntax, Terje Petersen, 19:07
- Re: Is the back door open?, Dave Crocker, 17:11
- Re: an excerpt from my SPF rejection logs, Michel Bouissou, 15:53
- Re: Is the back door open?, Andrew Newton, 15:13
- Re: Is the back door open?, Douglas Otis, 15:06
- Re: How is SPF different from RMX?, Alan DeKok, 14:48
- Re: Is the back door open?, Alan DeKok, 14:39
- an excerpt from my SPF rejection logs, Meng Weng Wong, 14:35
- Re: How is SPF different from RMX?, Markus Stumpf, 13:04
- Re: alternate submitter syntax, Meng Weng Wong, 12:45
- Re: Is the back door open?, Rand Wacker, 11:22
- Re: Is the back door open?, Douglas Otis, 10:58
- Re: Is the back door open?, Douglas Otis, 10:43
- RE: alternate submitter syntax, Daryl Odnert, 10:24
- Re: Is the back door open?, Andrew Newton, 10:11
- RE: Is the back door open?, Ryan Ordway, 09:11
- Re: Reading list for IETF meeting?, Andrew Newton, 09:02
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Richard Stallman, 09:01
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Richard Stallman, 09:01
- Back doors and syntax, John Glube, 05:02
- Re: Is the back door open?, Andrew Newton, 04:56
July 27, 2004
- Re: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Frank Ellermann, 23:32
- RE: alternate submitter syntax, Terje Petersen, 23:23
- Re: alternate submitter syntax, Meng Weng Wong, 22:35
- Re: Reading list for IETF meeting?, wayne, 21:10
- Re: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, wayne, 21:07
- RE: How is SPF different from RMX?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:00
- Re: Is the back door open?, Douglas Otis, 18:50
- Re: Is the back door open?, Andrew Newton, 18:26
- RE: alternate submitter syntax, Terje Petersen, 18:22
- Re: Is the back door open?, Douglas Otis, 18:05
- Re: Is the back door open?, Andrew Newton, 16:58
- Is the back door open?, Douglas Otis, 16:26
- RE: How is SPF different from RMX?, Larry Seltzer, 16:04
- Re: How is SPF different from RMX?, Alan DeKok, 15:11
- Re: alternate submitter syntax, Meng Weng Wong, 06:37
July 26, 2004
- RE: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Terje Petersen, 23:35
- RE: alternate submitter syntax, Terje Petersen, 22:42
- Re: alternate submitter syntax, Robert Barclay, 21:58
- Re: alternate submitter syntax, Meng Weng Wong, 21:31
- RE: alternate submitter syntax, Terje Petersen, 21:02
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marid-core-02.txt, Douglas Otis, 18:24
- RE: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:17
- Re: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Michel Bouissou, 14:56
- Re: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Michel Bouissou, 14:49
- Re: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Douglas Otis, 14:01
- Re: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Greg Connor, 13:02
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Douglas Otis, 12:57
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Douglas Otis, 12:47
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Michel Bouissou, 12:21
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Greg Connor, 12:08
- How is SPF different from RMX?, Dean Anderson, 11:29
- Re: Reading list for IETF meeting?, Andrew Newton, 08:18
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Richard Stallman, 07:30
- Re: alternate submitter syntax, Meng Weng Wong, 06:35
- RE: Sender-ID and free software, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:31
- Reading list for IETF meeting?, Hadmut Danisch, 05:41
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Andrew Newton, 05:30
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Michel Bouissou, 02:51
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:33
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:21
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:12
- Re: ESMTP "X-*" parameters, Dave Crocker, 01:09
July 25, 2004
- RE: alternate submitter syntax, Terje Petersen, 21:30
- Re: MARID compatibility with SPF records, Frank Ellermann, 21:10
- Re: alternate submitter syntax, Meng Weng Wong, 20:28
- ESMTP "X-*" parameters, Meng Weng Wong, 20:23
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Marshall Rose, 19:23
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Richard Stallman, 18:28
- alternate submitter syntax, Terje Petersen, 18:05
- RE: SUBMITTER extra information, Terje Petersen, 17:27
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Michel Bouissou, 16:48
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Andrew Newton, 16:08
- RE: Sender-ID and free software, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:19
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Michel Bouissou, 11:12
- Re: SUBMITTER extra information, Douglas Otis, 09:45
- RE: Sender-ID and free software, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:23
- SUBMITTER extra information, Pavel Zavyalov, 06:13
July 24, 2004
- draft-ietf-marid-protocol-00.txt, Tony Finch, 19:25
- draft-ietf-marid-submitter-02.txt, Tony Finch, 19:06
- draft-ietf-marid-core-02.txt, Tony Finch, 18:53
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Michel Bouissou, 14:53
- Re: Sender-ID and free software, Douglas Otis, 14:23
- Sender-ID and free software, Richard Stallman, 12:43
July 22, 2004
- Re: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Hector Santos, 21:33
- Bounce Address MUST BE VERIFIABLE! [Re: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT], Hector Santos, 21:23
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marid-submitter-02.txt, Terje Petersen, 18:07
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marid-submitter-02.txt, Dave Crocker, 12:02
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marid-core-02.txt, Mark Lentczner, 08:23
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marid-core-02.txt, Douglas Otis, 06:17
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marid-submitter-02.txt, Terje Petersen, 04:55
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marid-submitter-02.txt, Roy Badami, 01:51
July 21, 2004
- Re: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, David Beveridge, 21:54
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marid-submitter-02.txt, Terje Petersen, 20:11
- RE: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Terje Petersen, 19:38
- MARID agenda for IETF60, Marshall Rose, 19:07
- Re: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, David Beveridge, 19:04
- RE: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Terje Petersen, 17:58
- Re: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, David Beveridge, 17:04
- RE: MTAs should do what they're good at, Terje Petersen, 16:11
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marid-csv-dna-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, 12:49
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marid-csv-intro-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, 12:48
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marid-csv-csa-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, 12:48
- Example EPV-CORE CSV Implementation: [ Re: Comments and Concern about MARID-CORE: A Proposal], Hector Santos, 09:06
- RE: Comments on draft-ietf-marid-submitter-02, Harry Katz, 08:40
- Example EPV-CORE MARID Implementation: [ Re: Comments and Concern about MARID-CORE: A Proposal], Hector Santos, 06:33
- Re: MTAs should do what they're good at, David Beveridge, 04:23
- Protocol - Support for internationalization?, Chris Haynes, 03:38
- nits with marid-core-02, Jay Daley, 01:32
- Comments and Concern about MARID-CORE: A Proposal, Hector Santos, 00:50
July 20, 2004
- RE: MTAs should do what they're good at, Terje Petersen, 23:28
- Re: MTAs should do what they're good at, John Levine, 20:10
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marid-submitter-02.txt, Internet-Drafts, 13:16
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marid-core-02.txt, Internet-Drafts, 13:15
- smtp mailfrom meta-syntax issues, Dave Crocker, 12:44
- RE: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Roy Badami, 12:15
- Two Minor Points On MARID CORE Draft 02, Daryl Odnert, 11:33
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Andrew Newton, 10:39
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Margaret Olson, 09:36
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, wayne, 08:47
- RE: MARID compatibility with SPF records, John Glube, 04:24
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Tony Finch, 03:23
July 19, 2004
- Re: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Dave Crocker, 23:55
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Mark Lentczner, 21:32
- RE: Schedule for Sender-ID, John Glube, 19:39
- RE: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Terje Petersen, 19:24
- RE: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Jim Lyon, 18:30
- Re: MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Michel Bouissou, 18:07
- Re: Schedule for Sender-ID, Dave Crocker, 18:06
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Andrew Newton, 17:45
- MTAs should focus on email TRANSPORT not email CONTENT, Terje Petersen, 17:44
- RE: Schedule for Sender-ID, John Glube, 17:41
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Roy Badami, 16:32
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Roy Badami, 16:05
- Re: Schedule for Sender-ID, Dave Crocker, 15:43
- RE: Regarding the recent licensing thread, John Glube, 15:38
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Roy Badami, 15:27
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Tony Finch, 15:06
- Re: Schedule for Sender-ID, william(at)elan.net, 14:57
- Re: Schedule for Sender-ID, Margaret Olson, 14:52
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Mark Lentczner, 14:40
- PRA Algorithm Stats, Mark Lentczner, 14:32
- Comments on draft-ietf-marid-submitter-02, Daryl Odnert, 14:30
- Re: Schedule for Sender-ID, Andrew Newton, 14:20
- Re: Schedule for Sender-ID, Dave Crocker, 13:59
- Re: Schedule for Sender-ID, Margaret Olson, 13:09
- Schedule for Sender-ID, Andrew Newton, 12:40
- Regarding the recent licensing thread, Ted Hardie, 11:27
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Andrew Newton, 09:13
- RE: The licensing issue, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:05
- RE: The licensing issue, John Glube, 04:22
- Re: The licensing issue, Chris Haynes, 02:38
July 18, 2004
- RE: The licensing issue, Ian Peter, 16:37
- SPF compatibility restated, Roy Badami, 14:31
- RE: The licensing issue, John Glube, 13:22
- Re: MARID compatibility with SPF records, Dave Crocker, 12:07
- Re: The licensing issue, wayne, 11:12
- RE: The licensing issue, Harry Katz, 10:08
- draft-ietf-marid-submitter-02, Harry Katz, 09:59
- RE: Advancing input documents to RFC experimental status, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:11
July 17, 2004
- Re: MARID compatibility with SPF records, Margaret Olson, 14:18
- Re: MARID compatibility with SPF records, Mark Lentczner, 09:45
- Re: comments on draft-rosenberg-sipping-spam-00.txt, Dave Crocker, 07:57
- Re: Advancing input documents to RFC experimental status, Dave Crocker, 07:50
- Re: MARID compatibility with SPF records, Margaret Olson, 06:57
- Re: Where does MARID want to go today ?, Michael Weiner, 06:16
- Where does MARID want to go today ?, Michel Bouissou, 05:15
- Re: Licensing issues, Koen Martens, 04:35
- Re: MARID compatibility with SPF records, Andrew Newton, 03:59
- Re: Advancing input documents to RFC experimental status, Andrew Newton, 03:49
- Re: Licensing issues, Hector Santos, 01:42
- Re: Licensing issues, Michel Bouissou, 00:45
July 16, 2004
- Re: Licensing issues, wayne, 20:04
- Advancing input documents to RFC experimental status, Roy Badami, 18:15
- RE: Submitter shown the DOR, Tony Finch, 17:23
- MARID compatibility with SPF records, Roy Badami, 17:21
- draft-ietf-marid-core-02 is attached, Jim Lyon, 16:29
- RE: Submitter shown the DOR, Shevek, 13:38
- RE: Submitter shown the DOR, Tony Finch, 12:59
- RE: Submitter shown the DOR, Douglas Otis, 12:15
- RE: Licensing issues, Shevek, 12:09
- RE: Licensing issues, John Glube, 11:42
- Re: The licensing issue, mxcomp, 11:24
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Andrew Newton, 10:41
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Andrew Newton, 10:33
- RE: Licensing issues, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:57
- RE: Licensing issues, Ryan Ordway, 09:50
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Chuck Mead, 09:31
- Re: Licensing issues, Chris Haynes, 09:15
- RE: Licensing issues, John Glube, 09:13
- Re: Licensing issues, Chuck Mead, 08:10
- RE: Licensing issues, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:17
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Roy Badami, 03:45
- Licensing issues, Koen Martens, 02:57
- Re: Licensing issue, John Glube, 02:20
- Re: comments on draft-rosenberg-sipping-spam-00.txt, Edwin Aoki, 00:25
July 15, 2004
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Mark Lentczner, 20:38
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, wayne, 20:23
- Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Mark Lentczner, 19:55
- Re: The licensing issue, william(at)elan.net, 19:45
- Re: The licensing issue, Roy Badami, 19:22
- Re: The licensing issue, william(at)elan.net, 18:59
- Re: Drive Towards Consensus [was Re: On Extensibility in MARID Re cords], Mark Lentczner, 18:33
- PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Roy Badami, 18:20
- RE: Drive Towards Consensus [was Re: On Extensibility in MARID Re cords], Shevek, 17:51
- RE: Sender-ID licensing issue, Shevek, 17:19
- RE: Sender-ID licensing issue and French law, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:27
- RE: Improving SUBMITTER - Persisent User Address/Account (PUA), Harry Katz, 14:56
- Re: The licensing issue, Greg Connor, 14:35
- RE: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Harry Katz, 14:27
- RE: comments on draft-rosenberg-sipping-spam-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:37
- Re: comments on draft-rosenberg-sipping-spam-00.txt, Tony Finch, 06:56
- Re: comments on draft-rosenberg-sipping-spam-00.txt, Dave Crocker, 06:43
- RE: comments on draft-rosenberg-sipping-spam-00.txt, Gordon Fecyk, 06:07
- Re: Sender-ID licensing issue and French law, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:18
- Sender-ID licensing issue and French law, Michel Bouissou, 03:42
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Michel Bouissou, 01:59
July 14, 2004
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, wayne, 21:43
- comments on draft-rosenberg-sipping-spam-00.txt, Andrew Newton, 18:51
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Hector Santos, 18:19
- RE: The licensing issue, Harry Katz, 17:43
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Andrew Newton, 17:24
- The licensing issue, Mark Lentczner, 17:21
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Michel Bouissou, 16:19
- RE: where are the new drafts for SenderID? time is running out., Douglas Otis, 16:16
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, wayne, 15:44
- draft-ietf-marid-protocol-00.txt, Jutta Degener, 15:33
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, william(at)elan.net, 15:29
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Chuck Mead, 14:41
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Andrew Newton, 12:46
- RE: where are the new drafts for SenderID? time is running out., Harry Katz, 12:43
- Re: Submitter shown the DOR, Douglas Otis, 12:10
- RE: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Harry Katz, 12:03
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Shevek, 11:43
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Hector Santos, 10:58
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Ted Hardie, 10:44
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Shevek, 09:44
- where are the new drafts for SenderID? time is running out., wayne, 09:20
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Alan DeKok, 08:26
- Re: Submitter shown the DOR, Tony Finch, 02:54
July 13, 2004
- RE: SUBMITTER for Bounce Messages, Harry Katz, 23:58
- RE: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Gordon Fecyk, 21:08
- Submitter shown the DOR, Douglas Otis, 18:09
- FW: Improving SUBMITTER - Persisent User Address/Account (PUA), Scott Kitterman, 17:31
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, wayne, 17:08
- RE: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:38
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-marid-protocol-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, 13:03
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Chuck Mead, 11:28
July 12, 2004
- SUBMITTER for Bounce Messages, Hector Santos, 23:42
- Re: Improving SUBMITTER - Persisent User Address/Account (PUA), Hector Santos, 20:48
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, wayne, 20:19
- Re: Improving SUBMITTER - Persisent User Address/Account (PUA), Hector Santos, 20:10
- Re: Improving SUBMITTER - Persisent User Address/Account (PUA), Hector Santos, 19:50
- RE: the focus of MARID, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:27
- Comments on draft-ietf-marid-core-01.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:25
July 10, 2004
- Re: Improving SUBMITTER - Persisent User Address/Account (PUA), Greg Connor, 23:44
- RE: Improving SUBMITTER - Persisent User Address/Account (PUA), Scott Kitterman, 12:54
- SPF-Classic, Chuck Mead, 10:49
- Re: Improving SUBMITTER - Persisent User Address/Account (PUA), Margaret Olson, 07:52
- Re: Comments on marid-core-01, Tony Finch, 04:20
- Re: terminology: authentication / authorization, Dave Crocker, 03:07
- Comments on marid-core-01, Dave Crocker, 00:29
July 09, 2004
- Improving SUBMITTER - Persisent User Address/Account (PUA), Hector Santos, 18:57
- RE: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:50
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Douglas Otis, 17:59
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Greg Connor, 15:17
- Re: terminology: authentication / authorization, Meng Weng Wong, 15:13
- Re: terminology: authentication / authorization, Greg Connor, 14:26
- Re: terminology: authentication / authorization, John Leslie, 12:21
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Douglas Otis, 11:51
- RE: terminology: authentication / authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:42
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Alan DeKok, 08:51
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Alan DeKok, 08:31
- Re: terminology: authentication / authorization, John Leslie, 07:30
- FW: Comments on draft-ietf-marid-core-01.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:13
- Re: some thoughts on SUBMITTER, Tony Finch, 06:15
- Re: some thoughts on SUBMITTER, Tony Finch, 03:45
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Dave Crocker, 03:01
- Re: some thoughts on SUBMITTER, Dave Crocker, 01:08
- Re: terminology: authentication / authorization, Dave Crocker, 00:02
July 08, 2004
- RE: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:59
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Douglas Otis, 17:25
- RE: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:06
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Greg Connor, 15:16
- RE: terminology: authentication / authorization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:29
- terminology: authentication / authorization, Meng Weng Wong, 14:14
- some thoughts on SUBMITTER, Meng Weng Wong, 13:38
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Douglas Otis, 13:38
- RE: the focus of MARID, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:54
- RE: the focus of MARID, Greg Connor, 12:16
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Alan DeKok, 12:05
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Greg Connor, 11:51
- RE: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:23
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Dave Crocker, 09:16
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Alan DeKok, 07:54
- RE: the focus of MARID, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:24
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Valdis . Kletnieks, 06:53
- the focus of MARID, wayne, 00:14
July 07, 2004
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Alan DeKok, 20:52
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Hector Santos, 20:49
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Alan DeKok, 20:37
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 20:24
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Hector Santos, 20:22
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Eric A. Hall, 19:42
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Dave Crocker, 19:38
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Dave Crocker, 19:33
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Dave Crocker, 19:25
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Eric A. Hall, 19:14
- Re: Comments on marid-submitter-01, Dave Crocker, 19:13
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), wayne, 18:29
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Douglas Otis, 18:20
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Dave Crocker, 17:26
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Alan DeKok, 14:30
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), wayne, 13:39
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Alan DeKok, 12:25
- RE: Comments on marid-submitter-01, Harry Katz, 12:15
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Douglas Otis, 11:45
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Eric A. Hall, 11:18
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Alan DeKok, 10:51
- RE: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Greg Connor, 08:12
- RE: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Gordon Fecyk, 07:36
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Dave Crocker, 01:54
July 05, 2004
- [correction] RE: Is MARID-SUBMITTER is really necessary?, Gordon Fecyk, 19:44
- RE: Is MARID-SUBMITTER is really necessary?, Gordon Fecyk, 19:43
- Re: Is MARID-SUBMITTER is really necessary?, Hector Santos, 18:24
- Re: Why DNS?, Harold A'Hole, 17:54
- RE: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Gordon Fecyk, 16:13
- RE: Why DNS?, Fletcher Dunn, 15:29
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Alan DeKok, 11:34
- RE: Is MARID-SUBMITTER is really necessary?, Gordon Fecyk, 11:17
- Re: Comments on marid-submitter-01, Hector Santos, 04:51
- Is MARID-SUBMITTER is really necessary? SPF can be used to solve this problem., Hector Santos, 04:34
- Re: Comments on marid-submitter-01, Tony Finch, 02:02
July 04, 2004
- Re: Why DNS?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 22:07
- Revised draft-crocker-mail-arch, Dave Crocker, 19:24
- Comments on marid-submitter-01, Dave Crocker, 16:22
- Re: CSV stake in the ground, Dave Crocker, 05:53
- Re: CSV stake in the ground, Hector Santos, 02:56
- Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID, Dave Crocker, 00:17
- Re: Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Dave Crocker, 00:16
July 03, 2004
- Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID, wayne, 23:14
- Re: Pejorative wording in draft-ietf-marid-rationale-00, Meng Weng Wong, 22:38
- Pejorative wording in draft-ietf-marid-rationale-00, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 20:11
- Why DNS?, Fletcher Dunn, 16:37
- Re: consensus statement on CSV, Dave Crocker, 16:16
- Re: CSV stake in the ground, Dave Crocker, 16:15
- Re: CSV and alternative authentication techniques, Dave Crocker, 16:14
- Re: Fwd: MARID use of reverse-DNS, Greg Connor, 10:40
- RE: MARID use of reverse-DNS, Gordon Fecyk, 07:27
- Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID, wayne, 06:48
- Forging (was Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID ), Alan DeKok, 06:05
- Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID, Douglas Otis, 03:28
- Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID, Hector Santos, 00:15
July 02, 2004
- Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID, wayne, 21:42
- Re: CSV stake in the ground, Hector Santos, 18:55
- Re: consensus statement on CSV, Marshall Rose, 17:25
- Re: Unified SPF IDs?, william(at)elan.net, 17:02
- Re: Fwd: MARID use of reverse-DNS, william(at)elan.net, 16:58
- Unified SPF IDs?, Mark Lentczner, 16:53
- Re: consensus statement on CSV, Dave Crocker, 16:52
- Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID, Dave Crocker, 16:38
- Re: Fwd: MARID use of reverse-DNS, Jon Kyme, 16:27
- Fwd: MARID use of reverse-DNS, Andrew Newton, 15:36
- Re: CSV stake in the ground, Douglas Otis, 12:48
- consensus statement on CSV, Andrew Newton, 11:31
- Re: CSV stake in the ground, Hector Santos, 11:22
- CSV stake in the ground, Douglas Otis, 10:37
- Re: CSV and alternative authentication techniques, Douglas Otis, 10:05
- Re: CVS Questions/Comments [was Re: Comparing apples to multiple, hypothetical oranges], John Leslie, 07:13
- Re: DDOS attacks, Dave Crocker, 06:53
- Re: The problem with Unified SPF, Dave Crocker, 06:53
- Re: The problem with Unified SPF, Tony Finch, 06:23
- Re: CSV and STARTTLS, Andrew Newton, 03:40
- Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID, Greg Connor, 03:35
- Re: CSV and alternative authentication techniques, Tony Finch, 03:32
- Scripts breaking the DNS selector to ratio barrier or just breaking DNS?, Douglas Otis, 00:50
- Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID, Hector Santos, 00:21
July 01, 2004
- Re: Thoroughly Confused Sysadmins: Raise your hands, Greg Connor, 23:57
- Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID, Dave Crocker, 23:02
- Re: Who are we accrediting?, Dave Crocker, 23:02
- apology to matthew, Dave Crocker, 23:02
- Re: CSV and STARTTLS, John Leslie, 19:35
- Re: CSV and alternative authentication techniques, Hector Santos, 19:35
- Thoroughly Confused Sysadmins: Raise your hands, Gordon Fecyk, 18:46
- Re: The problem with Unified SPF, wayne, 18:13
- Re: CSV and alternative authentication techniques, Hector Santos, 17:06
- Re: Comparing apples to multiple, hypothetical oranges, Dave Crocker, 16:56
- Re: The problem with Unified SPF, Ted Hardie, 16:55
- Re: CVS Questions/Comments [was Re: Comparing apples to multiple, hypothetical oranges], Hector Santos, 16:44
- Re: The problem with Unified SPF, Roy Badami, 16:16
- Re: The problem with Unified SPF, Douglas Otis, 15:38
- Re: CSV and alternative authentication techniques, Douglas Otis, 13:33
- Re: The problem with Unified SPF, Roy Badami, 12:40
- CVS Questions/Comments [was Re: Comparing apples to multiple, hypothetical oranges], Roy Badami, 12:25
- Re: Comparing apples to multiple, hypothetical oranges, Alan DeKok, 10:39
- Re: Comparing apples to multiple, hypothetical oranges, Marshall Rose, 09:36
- DMP, was RE: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Tony Finch, 08:20
- RE: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Gordon Fecyk, 08:08
- SPF, New-SPF, SPF-Classic, SPF-ID, Sender-ID, Marid-core, etc., wayne, 07:54
- Re: CSV and alternative authentication techniques, Tony Finch, 07:11
- Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID, Olson, Margaret, 06:54
- Re: CSV and STARTTLS, Andrew Newton, 06:40
- CSV and alternative authentication techniques, Dave Crocker, 06:22
- Re: CSV and STARTTLS, Dave Crocker, 06:18
- Re: Differences between CSV and Sender-ID, Dave Crocker, 06:09
- Re: Comparing apples to multiple, hypothetical oranges, Alan DeKok, 06:04
- Re: Unified SPF overlaps with CSV, Dave Crocker, 06:02
- Re: CVS Questions/Comments [was Re: Comparing apples to multiple, hypothetical oranges], Tony Finch, 05:43
- Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Tony Finch, 04:59
- Re: CSV and STARTTLS, Tony Finch, 04:32
- Re: CVS Questions/Comments [was Re: Comparing apples to multiple, hypothetical oranges], Hector Santos, 03:07
- CVS Questions/Comments [was Re: Comparing apples to multiple, hypothetical oranges], Hector Santos, 02:26
June 30, 2004
- Re: CSV and STARTTLS, Hector Santos, 23:41
- Re: Comparing apples to multiple, hypothetical oranges, Greg Connor, 23:19
- RE: Obstacles between us and the finish line, Gordon Fecyk, 23:03
- Re: Who are we accrediting?, John Levine, 22:53
- Obstacles between us and the finish line, wayne, 22:39
- Re: Who are we accrediting?, Meng Weng Wong, 22:06