ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: alternate submitter syntax

2004-07-26 06:35:00

On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 02:30:17PM +1000, Terje Petersen wrote:
| 
| When I hit reply I expect to be corresponding with the PRA. 
| 

That would be funny, because the PRA should be b(_at_)b(_dot_)com,
which is yourself!

| 
| The text of the proposed SUBMITTER standard says:-
| 
| "
|    Furthermore, SMTP clients MUST, if necessary, insert such RFC 2822
|    headers as defined in section 4 of [SENDER-ID] in order to ensure
|    that the purported responsible address determined from the RFC 2822
|    headers by the receiving SMTP server will match the SUBMITTER
|    address.
| "
| 
| 
| 
| 
| QUESTION1: Are you suggesting that when C(_at_)C(_dot_)COM presses the reply 
button
| the email should be directed to somebody other than the PRA.  

The email should be directed to whoever's in the Reply-To or
From headers, just as things work today.

| QUESTION2: If the example you detail is correct then what are the 
| RFC.2822 headers that should match SUBMITTER as per the above quote
| from the proposed standard. And if the reply address is different then 
| should it not also be SPF checked. 

Resent-From, I think.  See the latest marid-core spec, which
describes PRA.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>