On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 02:02:23PM +1000, Terje Petersen wrote:
|
| TP> When I hit reply I expect to be corresponding with the PRA.
|
|
| MW> That would be funny, because the PRA should be b(_at_)b(_dot_)com,
| MW> which is yourself!
|
|
| TP> No! According to your example I am C(_at_)C(_dot_)com(_dot_)
| TP> You have not addressed the issue.
|
OK, then, if you are c(_at_)c(_dot_)com, who is b(_at_)b(_dot_)com?
I originally said:
In the forwarding case, where
a(_at_)a(_dot_)com sends mail to b(_at_)b(_dot_)com
b(_at_)b(_dot_)com forwards to c(_at_)c(_dot_)com,
When c.com receives the message, it sees
MAIL FROM:<a(_at_)a(_dot_)com> SUBMITTER=<b(_at_)b(_dot_)com>
Due to the nature of the forwarding relationship, b(_at_)b(_dot_)com
and c(_at_)c(_dot_)com can be said to represent the same entity.