Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields



On Jul 19, 2004, at 6:26 PM, Roy Badami wrote:

If the words "non-empty" were removed, step 3 would select the empty
Sender header, and step 5 would then fail to determine a PRA because
the header was malformed.


Makes sense to me.

-andy

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, (continued) Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Andrew Newton Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Andrew Newton PRA Algorithm Stats, Mark Lentczner Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Mark Lentczner Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Tony Finch Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Roy Badami Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Roy Badami Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Mark Lentczner Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Tony Finch Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Roy Badami Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Andrew Newton <= Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, wayne Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Margaret Olson Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Greg Connor Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Michel Bouissou Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Douglas Otis Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Douglas Otis Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Andrew Newton Re: PRA algorithm and use of non-standard header fields, Roy Badami