ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: CSV stake in the ground

2004-07-02 11:22:26

For what its worth,  as CSV stands today, it is difficult to endorse it or
warrant any further for product consideration or implementation for the
following five (5) simple reasons:

- Potentially high (unnecessary) SMTP redesign issues,
- Has higher than required SMTP compatibility conflicts,
- Potential customer acceptance (PR) issue regarding fee-based service
bureaus,
- Overall, the change vs. benefits offer no advantage over what SPF can not
offer. and
- You, nor Dave have never answered my comments/questions.

I don't care about SRV vs. TXT, that's a DNS admin thing.  But either way, I
will be looking to optimize or minimize the total number of lookups.

-- 
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Douglas Otis" <dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org>
To: "MARID" <ietf-mxcomp(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 1:37 PM
Subject: CSV stake in the ground



Rough consensus and working code...

I would like to put additional resources into CSV.  Should I be
confident these documents will not dramatically change?  It will become
a much prolonged time line (and wasted effort) if this devolves into a
debate how an SRV DNS record could be defined using a TXT record.

-Doug






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>