For what its worth, as CSV stands today, it is difficult to endorse it or
warrant any further for product consideration or implementation for the
following five (5) simple reasons:
- Potentially high (unnecessary) SMTP redesign issues,
- Has higher than required SMTP compatibility conflicts,
- Potential customer acceptance (PR) issue regarding fee-based service
bureaus,
- Overall, the change vs. benefits offer no advantage over what SPF can not
offer. and
- You, nor Dave have never answered my comments/questions.
I don't care about SRV vs. TXT, that's a DNS admin thing. But either way, I
will be looking to optimize or minimize the total number of lookups.
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Otis" <dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org>
To: "MARID" <ietf-mxcomp(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 1:37 PM
Subject: CSV stake in the ground
Rough consensus and working code...
I would like to put additional resources into CSV. Should I be
confident these documents will not dramatically change? It will become
a much prolonged time line (and wasted effort) if this devolves into a
debate how an SRV DNS record could be defined using a TXT record.
-Doug