Four questions:
* Since CSV and Sender ID are still on the table is it
appropriate for this review to be carried out for both
proposals, even though it is my understanding the schedule
is to review Sender-ID first and then CSV second?
* Given the WG has two technical advisors is it appropriate
for the WG Chairs to ask for their guidance as to whom
should be selected from the greybeard list to provide this
independent review?
* As to the parameters of the review, is it appropriate for
Marid to ask the WG Chairs in consultation with the WG
technical advisors to have a senior IETF review conducted
of both Sender-Id and CSV from the perspective of "security
and operations issues?"
* In conducting their review, given the guidance of Mr.
Hardie on the licensing issue, is it appropriate to ask
that this issue be considered as part of the review, on the
limited basis as outlined in his guidance, or should this
be simply "digged?"
John Glube
Toronto, Canada
The FTC Calls For One Standard For Sender Authentication
http://www.learnsteps4profit.com/dne.html
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.718 / Virus Database: 474 - Release Date: 09/07/2004