ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems (was Re: A spammer subscribed to this list ? )

2004-08-05 10:15:01


On 8/5/2004 12:11 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:

  Which has a "-0.001" for SPF_PASS, or marking the message as somehow
"better" for passing SPF.

  While this score is low enough to not effect much, I think it should
be forced to zero

I haven't looked at this particular ruleset yet, but a score of zero
usually means "don't run the test"

But "pass" truly is meaningless, so not bothering with that specific test
does make some sense.

"fail" is the only hard result that means anything.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>