Jim,
JL> I tend to agree. Should we remove the language about the future from
JL> the SUBMITTER spec?
my very strong, personal preference is to have a specification make no
statements about the future, and particularly not about plans.
the one exception, of course, is to show technical possibilities.
examples of how a spec is capable of being enhanced. not will be, not
planned to be, but what technical flexibilities are present.
and of course it's always good to show examples of how the spec might
be used NOW (or, rather, after it is published...)
sorry for being so pedantic, but i want to be clear about what i do
mean by the suggestion.
d/
--
Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>